Introduction
Receiving a subpoena to produce documents can be an unfamiliar and potentially disruptive experience for any business owner. While compliance is generally mandatory, navigating the process and understanding your rights is crucial.
Many businesses are unaware that they may be entitled to claim reasonable costs incurred while fulfilling the requirements of a subpoena to produce. This guide explains your obligations when issued with such a subpoena and outlines how you can recover associated expenses under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR).
Understanding Your Business Obligations & Rights with a Subpoena to Produce
What a Subpoena to Produce Means for Your Business
Receiving a subpoena to produce documents can be an unfamiliar experience for business owners. As a formal legal notice, it requires your business to:
- gather specific documents relevant to a court case or legal matter, and
- provide those documents within the specified time frame.
Generally, you must comply with these requirements.
Your Right to Claim Reasonable Costs
While complying with a subpoena is necessary, many business owners are unaware of their rights regarding associated expenses. The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR) allow businesses to claim the reasonable costs incurred during the process of producing the requested documents. This differs from subpoenas that require someone to attend court to give evidence.
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Conduct Money & Reasonable Costs for a Subpoena to Produce
Why Conduct Money Usually Does Not Apply to Your Subpoena to Produce
A common question regarding subpoenas is whether you can refuse compliance if the conduct money seems insufficient. However, the requirement to provide conduct money generally applies only to subpoenas that compel attendance to give evidence, not those solely for producing documents.
This principle is established in legal precedent, including:
These decisions confirm that under rule 33.6(1) of the UCPR, the obligation to tender conduct money is limited to subpoenas requiring a person to attend court to testify. Therefore, for a subpoena that only requires your business to produce documents, the issuing party is typically not obligated to provide conduct money upfront.
The Court’s Power to Award Reasonable Costs Under UCPR 33.11
While conduct money may not apply to a subpoena for production, the court has the authority to ensure you are compensated for the effort involved. Under rule 33.11(1) of the UCPR, the court may order the party who issued the subpoena to pay the reasonable loss or expense you incurred in complying with it.
This means that, even without upfront conduct money, your business can seek reimbursement for:
- the costs associated with gathering the requested documents
- the expenses involved in providing those documents
Importantly, any amount awarded by the court under rule 33.11(3) is distinct from—and additional to—any conduct money or witness expenses that might apply in other circumstances.
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
How Reasonable Costs for Subpoena Compliance Are Determined
The Court’s Focus on Reasonableness Not Taxation
When determining the costs and expenses associated with complying with a subpoena, the court’s primary role is to assess whether the claimed costs were reasonably incurred. This process is distinct from a formal taxation or assessment of costs.
In other words, the emphasis remains squarely on the reasonableness of the expenses tied directly to the compliance effort itself.
Key Factors from the NewSat Case for Business Owners
The Federal Court’s decision In the matter of NewSat Limited (receivers and managers appointed) (in liquidation) provides guidance on how courts assess reasonable costs for subpoena compliance. Key considerations highlighted in this case include:
- Compensation for Search Time: Although no specific statute mandates compensation for time spent searching for documents for an order to produce, the court acknowledged it is appropriate to make an allowance for this effort.
- Relevance of Subpoena Cost Principles: The established legal principles regarding costs and expenses for complying with a subpoena are relevant when considering claims related to orders for production.
- Engaging External Lawyers: It can be considered reasonable for a business receiving a subpoena to hire an external law firm for tasks like reviewing documents, especially when dealing with significant time pressures or large volumes of material. This includes reviewing for relevance.
- Internal Capacity Not Scrutinised: The court generally does not investigate the internal work capacity of the third party ordered to produce documents when assessing the reasonableness of engaging external help.
- Manual Document Review: Undertaking a manual review of each document to determine its relevance, check for legal privilege, and assess confidentiality can be deemed a reasonable step in the compliance process.
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Types of Costs Your Business Can Claim for a Subpoena
Claiming Internal Costs
When your business complies with a subpoena to produce documents, you may incur various internal costs. These expenses are directly related to the time and resources your business spends gathering and organising the required information. You can include the following in your claim for reasonable costs:
- Staff hours devoted to locating and collecting documents
- Costs of data management and document-handling resources
Claiming External Legal Costs for Document Review
It is often necessary to engage external lawyers to assist with the subpoena response, particularly when dealing with large volumes of documents or tight deadlines. The fees charged by these lawyers cover tasks such as:
- Reviewing documents to ensure relevance
- Checking for legal privilege
- Assessing confidentiality
Consequently, these external legal costs associated with document review for the subpoena can typically be claimed.
Claiming External Legal Costs for Advice
Beyond just reviewing documents, you might need specific legal advice regarding your obligations and rights concerning the subpoena. The costs associated with obtaining this external legal counsel—to navigate the complexities of the subpoena compliance process—are also potentially claimable as part of your reasonable expenses.
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
The Process for Claiming Your Subpoena Costs
Applying to the Court for a Costs Order
Your business may apply under rule 33.11(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 for a court order requiring the party that issued the subpoena to pay the reasonable loss or expense incurred in complying with it.
If the court makes such an order, it will then:
- determine the specific amount payable, or
- direct how that amount should be calculated according to its usual procedures for costs.
This provides a formal pathway to recover the costs associated with the subpoena.
Negotiating Costs Outside Court
Alternatively, you can resolve subpoena costs through commercial negotiation with the issuing party. During these discussions, consider factors such as:
- internal time spent, and
- any external legal fees incurred for document review or advice.
By addressing these elements collaboratively, both parties may reach an agreement without resorting to formal court proceedings.
Seeking Legal Assistance for Your Subpoena Response & Costs Claim
Because responding to a subpoena and claiming related costs can be complex, seeking legal advice is crucial. Lawyers can:
- review documents,
- advise on your rights and obligations, and
- negotiate or formally claim the reasonable costs your business has incurred.
With professional guidance, you can navigate the process confidently and effectively.
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Conclusion
Receiving a subpoena to produce documents requires compliance, but your business has the right under rule 33.11 of the UCPR to claim reasonable costs incurred, including internal expenses and external legal fees, even though conduct money typically does not apply. Understanding how these costs are assessed based on reasonableness and the factors outlined in cases like NewSat is crucial for recovering expenses associated with the subpoena.
Navigating the complexities of subpoena compliance and cost recovery can be challenging, so contact PBL Law Group today for trusted expertise. Our commercial and business lawyers in NSW can provide specialised advice tailored to your situation, assisting with document review and negotiating or claiming your reasonable costs to ensure a smooth process.
Frequently Asked Questions
A subpoena to produce documents is a formal legal notice that requires a business or individual to gather specific documents relevant to a court case and provide them as directed. Compliance with the terms of the subpoena is generally mandatory.
Yes, you generally must comply with a subpoena to produce documents even if you believe the conduct money offered is insufficient. Legal precedent, including Re Bauhaus Pyrmont Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 253 and Hall v Donlon [2011] NSWSC 1088, confirms that the requirement to provide conduct money under rule 33.6(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) applies primarily to subpoenas requiring court attendance, not just document production.
No, the party issuing a subpoena is generally not required to pay conduct money when the subpoena is solely for the production of documents. This differs from subpoenas that compel a person to attend court to give evidence, where conduct money is typically required under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
Yes, your business can claim reasonable loss or expense incurred while complying with a subpoena to produce documents. You can apply to the court under rule 33.11(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) for an order requiring the issuing party to pay these costs.
Rule 33.11 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) allows the court to order the party who issued the subpoena to pay the reasonable loss or expense incurred by your business in complying with it. The court has the discretion to make such an order to ensure fair compensation for your compliance efforts.
Your business may claim reasonable costs including internal expenses, such as staff time spent searching for and preparing documents. Additionally, external legal costs incurred for reviewing documents for relevance, privilege, or confidentiality, and costs for obtaining legal advice regarding the subpoena, may also be claimable.
A court determines the reasonableness of claimed costs by assessing whether they were genuinely incurred during the compliance process, rather than conducting a formal taxation of costs. Factors considered, as highlighted in the NewSat case, include the appropriateness of compensating for search time, the necessity of manual document review, and the reasonableness of engaging external lawyers based on time constraints or document volume.
Yes, it can be considered reasonable for your business to hire external lawyers to assist with reviewing documents for relevance, privilege, and confidentiality, particularly when dealing with large volumes of material or tight deadlines. The associated external legal costs for this review work are potentially claimable as part of your reasonable expenses.
If the party who issued the subpoena disputes the costs claimed, your business can apply to the court under rule 33.11 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) for an order determining the amount payable. Alternatively, the matter of costs can often be resolved through commercial negotiation between your business and the issuing party.