Residential Apartment Developers in the Firing Line

4 min read

One of the most common problems when owners of residential apartments find defects in their buildings is that it’s not immediately obvious who they can chase for rectification or how they can compel the work to happen without protracted legal proceedings. Also, once apartments have sold, the developer has realised its profits and the bank has been paid, there is minimal real incentive for it to do anything about defects.

As part of its sweeping construction industry reform packages, NSW has introduced legislation specifically designed to assist with this scenario.

The Residential Apartment Buildings (Compliance and Enforcement Powers) Act 2020 provides several powerful tools to help apartment owners and bodies corporate with both investigating defects and enforcing rectification.

In this article, we’ll take a look at how the new Act works and the circumstances in which it might apply to you.

How Does the Act Achieve Its Goals?

The basic idea of the Act is to give the Secretary of the Department of Customer Services a variety of proactive powers that might prevent defective buildings being occupied or ensure that defects are rectified promptly.

To facilitate that, the Act:

  1. Requires developers to provide the Secretary advance notice of expected completion dates for projects;
  2. Authorises officers appointed under the Act some investigative powers;
  3. Creates offences for non-compliance;
  4. Exposes directors and other people in management to potential personal liability if their associated company breaches the Act.

Using those tools and incentives, the Secretary can:

  1. Order building work to be rectified;
  2. Issue stop work orders;
  3. Prevent a strata plan or occupation certificate from being issued for a development.

The completion and occupation of a residential apartment development is a critical element of the process for the developer, so these powers are designed to ensure that developers do everything necessary to ensure apartment buildings are free from serious defects before they are occupied.

The Wide Net – Who’s a Developer?

One of the most startling elements of the new legislation is the sheer scope of who is captured by the definition of “developer”.

As it’s currently defined, a “Developer” is:

  1. The owner of the land on which the construction is occurring.
  2. The “person responsible for the overall coordination and control of the carrying out of the building work” (i.e., the principal contractor).
  3. A person who “facilitates or causes (directly or indirectly) the building work to be carried out”.

This last definition is going to catch a large number of parties who might otherwise have been able to wash their hands of any potential liability to do anything about serious defects, but now will quite possibly be caught.

That might include, for example, controlling holding companies who are the real beneficiaries of any profits, banks who are calling the shots, or the “people behind the companies” in some circumstances.

Which Building Work is Captured by the Obligations?

Only residential apartment building work is caught by this Act.

In building terms, that means the Act applies to a “class 2” building or one which carries a class 2 component under the Building Code of Australia.

The Act is also limited to building work relating to a residential apartment building that is, or was, authorised to commence under the EPA Act.

In real terms though, these requirements will capture many residential apartment buildings around NSW.

What Kinds of Defects Does the Act Cover?

This Act isn’t designed to help you fix small defects like sticking doors or the wrong colour tiles.

It is precisely drafted to deal mainly with “serious” defects. These are:

  1. A nonconforming building product under the Building Products (Safety) Act 2017 (an act designed to prevent the use of combustible cladding, although it does have wider application)
  2. A defect in the building or a piece of it which doesn’t comply with the:
    1. Approved plans;
    2. Relevant Australian Standard; or
    3. Building Code.
  3. Another defect which is serious enough to mean that the building can’t be inhabited, used for its intended purpose, or that the building is vulnerable to collapse or might need to be destroyed in whole or in part.

There is scope to expand this list, but that hasn’t occurred yet.

Even Better… It’s Retrospective

Much like other recent developments in NSW construction law, the Act applies backwards to building work that:

  • has been completed since 1 September 2010; or
  • was incomplete at the time the Act came into force on 1 September.

How Does the Act Actually Help?

There are three central powers granted to the Secretary under the Act that can be used to prevent unsafe buildings being made available for occupation.

Prohibition Orders

If the Secretary believes that the building is unsafe or non-compliant, an order can be issued preventing the issue of an occupation certificate or registration of a strata plan.

Prohibition orders can also be made if the developer failed to give notice of intended completion (see below) or failed to pay the full required strata bond.

In essence, this would prevent the sales of the apartments going ahead or, at least, prevent people from being able to move in before the defects are remedied.

This applies significant pressure on building developers given the commercial flow-on effect it will have if sales cannot go through.

Stop Work Orders

In some cases, the Secretary can issue an order that the developer cease all work on site.

This might happen if the Secretary believes that the building work is being done in a way that could cause significant “harm or loss” to relevant people or significant property damage.

If the developer keeps working despite a stop work order they can be issued fines up to $330,000 plus another $33,000 for each day the breach continues.

Rectification Orders

If the Secretary believes there is a potential serious defect, an order can be issued requiring the necessary steps to be taken to eliminate, minimise or remediate that defect.

The Secretary can also put conditions on rectification orders specifying what must be done or how it must be done. A reasonable time must be given for the work to be carried out.

Except in emergency situations, however, the Secretary is generally required to give the developer a “show cause” notice and allow a reasonable time for the recipient to respond before issuing such a rectification order.

Again, failure to comply can have the same considerable fines as above.

Can Developers Appeal?

Decisions by the Secretary to take steps under the Act can be appealed. However, unless the Court issues an order saying otherwise, the decision will remain in force despite the appeal being lodged.

Developers do have some other protections under the Act though, to ensure that due process is followed.

What is the Notification Scheme and Why Does It Exist?

For the Secretary to have an opportunity to actually use the powers granted by the Act, an essential piece of the puzzle is the requirement for developers to give notice of anticipated project completion. This ensures that investigations can occur and, in theory, that any defects or issues of non-compliance can be spotted before people start moving into new apartment buildings.

In short, a developer has to give 6-12 months’ notice before applying for an occupation certificate.

The notice needs to state the date that the developer expects to apply for occupation. After issuing, if the developer thinks that will change by more than 60 days, then an amendment notice can also be lodged.

If the building work can be completed within 6 months of commencement, then the notice needs to be given within 30 days of the works commencing.

If more than one person fits under the “developer” definition (which will often be the case given the scope of the definition as discussed above), then it’s sufficient for just one of them to give the notice.

Personal Liability

Directors and some management are deemed to have breached the provisions of the Act if the company itself does.

What Should Developers Be Doing Now?

There are some practical steps you should be taking now to ensure compliance:

  1. Understand if you might be a “developer” under this Act – even if most of the time you wouldn’t use that word to describe yourself. If in doubt, get in touch with us and we’ll give you some advice on it.
  2. Get your head around the notification requirements. That means:
    1. Review your current contracts and see if notices need to be issued. If you have projects you expect to finish within 6 months, then you should have provided notice by 15 September 2020. If you haven’t get in now and get it done ASAP.
    2. Diarise when anticipated completion notices should likely be given for ongoing projects.
  3. Implement a practical process for dealing with any notices issued to you under the new Act. They cannot go ignored as the Secretary has significant powers that can bring your development to a standstill.
  4. For contracts going forward, consider specifying who is responsible for compliance with the Act. While you can’t really absolve yourself of responsibility under the Act, you can at least ensure that between you and the other contracting parties everyone knows who is taking responsibility for notification requirements and the like.

If you need help understanding the new Act and how it might apply to you, get in touch and we’d be happy to help.

Loading

Loading

Picture of Authored By<br>PBLTeam

Authored By
PBLTeam

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need
Share this Article

Book a 15-Min Consultation​

Rated 5-Star By Our Clients

Jye Hall
Anita Bradley has been an absolute dream to deal with. Anita's conveyancing skills and knowledge knows absolutely no boundaries along with her effective communication skills which has made selling and buying a completely stress free exchange for us. We recommend PBL Law to everyone looking for outstanding service. We will definitely be returning clients.
Kushlan Aluwihare
PBL Law Group were fantastic. Anita from PBL worked with us closely during our property search and made the exchange and settlement process smooth and stress free. Highly recommended.
Gail Whitford
PBL handled my late mothers estate, they were very obliging and patient with any and all questions that we had, thank you to David , Sharon and the other staff that we dealt with, everyone was so easy to talk to and friendly .David came to the home where my Mother was living and helped her to get her will in order, Sharon helped us through the process of executing her wishes when the time came even doing a house call which was so much easier, thank you all so much
S M
I have experienced an excellent service from PBL (especially from Anita) during the sale of my recent property on Central Coast, and during the purchase of our current property in Sydney. Throughout many challengers, especially with the sale, Anita presented her very professional and knowledgeable conveyancer, positively solving all obstacles. "Above and Beyond" Award going to Anita!!! :-)
Amanda Reitzin
The five-star reviews are well-deserved. I needed a motion and a bylaw drawn up for urgent repairs of my strata unit and the AGM was in two weeks' time. My solicitor was friendly, efficient, knew what documents to ask for, and had all the paperwork prepared well within the timeframe. She also took the time to run through all the legalese and the different possible scenarios with me to make sure I understood. I am so glad to have found this firm and I will not hesitate to use their services again in future if the need arises.
Ricky Cooper
Anita is amazing! So attentive, approachable and communicates everything every step of the way. I have now bought and sold property with Anita and I cannot recommend her highly enough.
Ron Thomsen
Our Commercial Property conveyancing was handled very professionally. Anita’s experience and responsiveness was an asset in this transaction.
Trace M
I am so grateful for Anita Bradley from PBL Law Group helped me with this property settlement, she has went above beyond to ensure I understand everything because of our deafness. I will recommended Anita or their team. Thank you so much for all the hard work you have done for us.
Tricia Wheatstone
For almost 18 months I have been a client of Alex Ilkin. Alex is very knowledgeable and professional and has consistently provided me with thorough, honest and well set out advice, including steering my case through appeal proceedings. He always worked for my best interests with integrity and compassion. I recommend Alex and his team at PBL.

Latest insights & Practical Guides

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

We will call you within 24 hours.

How Can Our Expert Lawyers Help?

Strata Law

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

Jye Hall
Anita Bradley has been an absolute dream to deal with. Anita's conveyancing skills and knowledge knows absolutely no boundaries along with her effective communication skills which has made selling and buying a completely stress free exchange for us. We recommend PBL Law to everyone looking for outstanding service. We will definitely be returning clients.
Kushlan Aluwihare
PBL Law Group were fantastic. Anita from PBL worked with us closely during our property search and made the exchange and settlement process smooth and stress free. Highly recommended.
Gail Whitford
PBL handled my late mothers estate, they were very obliging and patient with any and all questions that we had, thank you to David , Sharon and the other staff that we dealt with, everyone was so easy to talk to and friendly .David came to the home where my Mother was living and helped her to get her will in order, Sharon helped us through the process of executing her wishes when the time came even doing a house call which was so much easier, thank you all so much
S M
I have experienced an excellent service from PBL (especially from Anita) during the sale of my recent property on Central Coast, and during the purchase of our current property in Sydney. Throughout many challengers, especially with the sale, Anita presented her very professional and knowledgeable conveyancer, positively solving all obstacles. "Above and Beyond" Award going to Anita!!! :-)
Amanda Reitzin
The five-star reviews are well-deserved. I needed a motion and a bylaw drawn up for urgent repairs of my strata unit and the AGM was in two weeks' time. My solicitor was friendly, efficient, knew what documents to ask for, and had all the paperwork prepared well within the timeframe. She also took the time to run through all the legalese and the different possible scenarios with me to make sure I understood. I am so glad to have found this firm and I will not hesitate to use their services again in future if the need arises.
Ricky Cooper
Anita is amazing! So attentive, approachable and communicates everything every step of the way. I have now bought and sold property with Anita and I cannot recommend her highly enough.
Ron Thomsen
Our Commercial Property conveyancing was handled very professionally. Anita’s experience and responsiveness was an asset in this transaction.
Trace M
I am so grateful for Anita Bradley from PBL Law Group helped me with this property settlement, she has went above beyond to ensure I understand everything because of our deafness. I will recommended Anita or their team. Thank you so much for all the hard work you have done for us.
Tricia Wheatstone
For almost 18 months I have been a client of Alex Ilkin. Alex is very knowledgeable and professional and has consistently provided me with thorough, honest and well set out advice, including steering my case through appeal proceedings. He always worked for my best interests with integrity and compassion. I recommend Alex and his team at PBL.