Unfair Dismissal and Maximum Term Contracts

Speak To Us Today

Your First Consultation Free

In the case of Khayam v Navitas English Pty Ltd, the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC)revisited the issue of unfair dismissal in ‘Outer Limit’ employment contracts, also know as maximum term contracts.

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) FWA provides that a person is only dismissed, and thus capable of bringing an unfair dismissal claim, if their employment is ‘terminated on the employer’s initiative’.  There are some exclusions to this, one is, a person ‘employed under a contract of employment for a specified period of time’ where the employment has been terminated at the end of the period, such as an outer limit contract.

Outer limit contracts are commonly used, most often where the ongoing employment is subject to uncertainty beyond the nominated term, such as where the employment is contingent on ongoing funding or the continuation of a project.

The longstanding authority was that an employee whose employment ended as a result of the expiry of the nominated term in a n outer limit contract was not eligible to bring an unfair dismissal claim because the employment is not ‘terminated on the employer’s initiative’. Instead, the employment ended due to the ‘effluxion of time’.

In the above mentioned case, the FWC opened the door for unfair dismissal actions to be commenced by employees who were subject to an outer limit contract.

After a lengthy analysis of the authorities that drew a distinction between the employment relationship and employment contract, the majority held that assessing whether a dismissal has occurred requires consideration of the employment relationship, not the current employment contract. This distinction becomes important in the context of an employment relationship made up of a series of time-limited contracts.

Therefore, where the contract has a defined term but does not state that the relationship will end when the employment term expires, a decision not to offer a new contract may be a dismissal under the Act.



Authored by
Director Lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Today

Speak to us Now on

or Request a Call Back.

We respond within 24 hours.
From Our Experience

Expert Insights That Matter to You

Get Help Today

Request a Call Back

Use the form to request a call back from one of our expert lawyers.

We respond within 24 hours.

Or Speak to us now on

Raea Khan Circle
Director Lawyer
Raea Khan

Raea is Managing Director and Principal Lawyer for PBl Law Group. Raea assists clients with major projects, property developments, construction and strata law.

He has worked in Western Australia and Queensland assisting with expansion projects in the energy and resource sector and now predominately advises clients in Strata and Community Association matters.

He is a member of the Australian College of Strata Lawyers where majority of his work is advising developers and owners corporations with dispute related minor and major defects, strata governance and common property litigation. He is proficient at leading negotiations and meetings.

Raea has a particular interest in the commercial aspect of any dispute and always tries to weigh up the risk, reward and benefit of legal proceedings at each different stage.

Raea enjoys all forms of competitive sport, including Crossfit and actively participates in Triathlons, representing Australia as an age group athlete. He was a member of Red Head Surf Lifesaving club.

  • Strata Law
  • Construction & Major Projects
  • Commercial and Business Law
  • Planning & Environment Law