In New South Wales (NSW), the concept of a “notional estate” adds another layer to family provision claims under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). This legal mechanism empowers the court to consider assets that weren’t formally owned by the deceased at the time of death, potentially impacting how family provision orders are fulfilled. This article delves into the intricacies of notional estate orders, examining their application, eligibility criteria, and implications for estate planning in NSW.

What to Know About Notional Estates in NSW

Definition and Purpose of Notional Estates

In New South Wales (NSW), the concept of a “notional estate” plays a crucial role in family provision claims. Unlike the “actual estate,” which encompasses assets solely owned by the deceased at death, the notional estate broadens the scope to include assets transferred before death under specific circumstances. This inclusion aims to prevent individuals from circumventing family provision laws by shifting assets out of their name before death.

Imagine a scenario where a parent gifts a significant property to one child shortly before their death, leaving their other children with minimal inheritance. The notional estate provisions allow the disadvantaged children to make a claim on the gifted property, ensuring a fairer distribution of assets.

Legal Basis: The Succession Act 2006 (NSW)

The legal framework for notional estates is established by the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), specifically Part 3.3. This legislation empowers the Supreme Court of NSW to designate certain assets as part of the deceased’s estate, even if they weren’t legally owned by the deceased at the time of death. This applies to situations where assets were transferred without “full valuable consideration,” essentially meaning they were gifted or sold significantly below market value. The Act aims to balance testamentary freedom with the deceased’s moral obligation to provide for eligible family members.

Assets That Can Be Designated as Notional Estate

A notional estate doesn’t encompass every asset owned by the deceased. It focuses on specific types of assets, particularly those that were transferred before death under circumstances suggesting an intention to diminish the rightful inheritance of eligible family members. Here are some examples of assets that can be designated as notional estate:

Asset Type	Description	Example Scenario
Jointly Held Property	Property held as joint tenants can be included in the deceased’s notional estate. The surviving owner automatically inherits the entire property, but if other dependants (e.g., children from a previous relationship) were not adequately provided for, the court may include a portion of the property in the notional estate to ensure a fair distribution.	A married couple owns their home as joint tenants. Upon the death of one spouse, the surviving spouse becomes the sole owner. However, if the deceased had children from a previous relationship who were not provided for, a portion of the property may be included in the notional estate to ensure the children receive their share.
Superannuation and Life Insurance Benefits	Superannuation and life insurance benefits, while usually held in trust, can be included in a notional estate under certain conditions. If the court finds that these benefits were allocated in a way that doesn’t adequately provide for dependants, they can be considered part of the notional estate.	A deceased person nominates their spouse as the sole beneficiary of superannuation death benefits. If this doesn’t provide for a dependent child from a previous relationship, the court may order a portion of the superannuation to be included in the notional estate to provide for the child.
Assets Held in Trusts and Companies	Assets transferred to trusts or companies controlled by the deceased may be included in a notional estate if the court believes the transfer was intended to reduce the estate and disadvantage potential claimants. This ensures that family provision obligations are met, even for assets not directly in the personal estate.	A person transfers assets to a trust they control. If the court believes this was done to avoid providing for dependants, they may include those assets in the notional estate to ensure a fair distribution among claimants.

Eligibility to Make a Notional Estate Claim

Eligible Persons

Under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), only certain individuals are eligible to make a family provision claim, which may include a notional estate claim. These eligible persons are typically close family members who are considered to have a claim on the deceased’s estate. Examples of eligible persons can include:

• Spouses or de facto partners (including same-sex partners)
• Children (including adopted children)
• Former spouses
• Grandchildren
• Dependents who were wholly or partly dependent on the deceased person

Time Limits for Claims

Strict time limits apply to making a family provision claim that includes a notional estate claim in NSW. Generally, eligible persons must make a claim within 12 months from the date of the deceased person’s death. Missing this deadline can result in the claim being barred. However, the court has the discretion to extend the time limit in certain circumstances.

The Notional Estate Claim Application Process

Requirements for a Successful Claim

To determine whether a notional estate order is appropriate, the court considers various factors, including whether the deceased transferred property at less than full value. A transaction involving “full valuable consideration” occurs when an asset is exchanged for money or an asset of equal worth. For instance, if the deceased sold a property for its appraised market value, this would likely be considered full valuable consideration. Conversely, transferring property for a nominal fee or as a gift would generally not meet this definition.

Beyond the nature of the transaction, the court considers whether the transfer disadvantaged the person applying for the family provision order, the deceased, or a principal party to the transaction. For example, imagine a scenario where a couple owns a property as joint tenants. Shortly before their death, one spouse transfers their share to a third party for a significantly reduced price, disadvantaging the surviving spouse. Such a scenario could potentially meet the disadvantage requirement.

The timing of the transaction is also critical. Transfers made within one year of the deceased’s death are scrutinised more closely, especially if the deceased had a moral obligation to provide for the claimant. This obligation must have been more significant than any moral obligation the deceased might have had to engage in the transaction.

For transfers made between one and three years before death, the court examines whether the deceased intended to limit provisions for eligible claimants. For instance, if a person transferred assets to reduce their estate’s value and minimise potential family provision claims, this could be considered an attempt to limit provision.

Court Considerations in Notional Estate Orders

When deciding whether to make a notional estate order, the court prioritises the importance of not interfering with reasonable expectations related to property. The court aims to balance the interests of all parties involved, considering the deceased’s intentions, the beneficiaries’ expectations, and the eligible claimants’ needs.

The court also evaluates the merits of making the order and whether it serves substantial justice. This involves considering factors such as the relationship between the deceased and the claimant, the claimant’s financial needs, and the size and nature of the estate. The court aims to achieve a fair and equitable outcome for all parties involved, considering the specific circumstances of each case.

Impact of Notional Estate Orders on Estate Planning

Challenges for Testators and Beneficiaries

Notional estate orders in NSW present unique challenges for individuals planning their estates and those who may benefit from them. The legislation introduces a layer of complexity, particularly for those seeking to distribute assets outside their will.

For instance, a testator might consider transferring assets into a trust to manage their distribution after death. However, if the court deems this transfer as an attempt to disadvantage potential claimants under family provision laws, the assets could be clawed back into the notional estate. This situation highlights the importance of seeking expert legal advice during estate planning to ensure that asset distribution aligns with the testator’s wishes while considering potential family provision claims.

Strategies to Minimise Notional Estate Risks

While notional estate orders add complexity, there are strategies to mitigate potential risks:

• Seek legal advice: Consulting an experienced estate planning lawyer is crucial. They can advise on structuring asset ownership and transactions to minimise the risk of assets being included in the notional estate.
• Transparency and documentation: Maintaining clear records of transactions, particularly those involving significant assets or potential beneficiaries, is essential. This documentation can demonstrate the intentions behind the transactions.
• Consideration and arm’s length transactions: When transferring assets, ensure they occur at arm’s length and for full valuable consideration. This approach can help demonstrate that transactions were not intended to disadvantage potential claimants.
• Review and update estate plans: Regularly review and update estate plans, especially after significant life events like marriage, divorce, or the birth of children. This proactive approach ensures that the plan reflects current circumstances and minimises potential disputes.
• Open communication: Communication with potential beneficiaries about estate planning decisions can prevent misunderstandings and potential legal challenges.

Case Studies on New South Wales Notional Estate Claims

Case Study 1: Jointly Held Property

Scenario: John and Mary, a married couple, own their family home as joint tenants. John passes away, and his will leaves all his assets to their son, David. Mary feels that the will does not adequately provide for her and makes a family provision claim.

Potential Outcome: The court may consider the family home as part of John’s notional estate. Even though the property automatically transferred to Mary upon John’s death, the court can assess if this arrangement disadvantages Mary under the family provision claim.

Case Study 2: Superannuation Benefits

Scenario: Jane designates her sister, Lisa, as the beneficiary of her superannuation death benefits. After Jane’s passing, her daughter, Sarah, who was financially dependent on Jane, believes she hasn’t received adequate provision from the estate.

Potential Outcome: Sarah could apply for a notional estate order to include Jane’s superannuation benefits in the estate. The court would consider factors like Sarah’s financial dependency and whether the existing provision adequately caters to her needs.

Case Study 3: Assets Transferred Before Death

Scenario: Two years before his death, Robert transfers his investment property to his second wife, Emily, for a nominal sum. His son from a previous marriage, Thomas, argues that this transfer was intended to limit his inheritance and disadvantages him.

Potential Outcome: The court may deem the property transfer as a relevant transaction for a notional estate claim. Factors considered would include the timing of the transfer, the value exchanged, and whether it aimed to disadvantage Thomas in the estate distribution.

Conclusion

Notional estate orders in NSW represent a significant aspect of family provision law, allowing for a more equitable distribution of assets in deceased estates. By potentially including assets transferred before death, these orders ensure fairness for eligible family members who may not have been adequately provided for. Understanding the complexities of notional estates, eligibility criteria, and the court’s considerations is crucial for both estate planning and potential family provision claims.

Seeking legal advice is essential to navigate the intricacies of notional estate orders in NSW. Whether you are planning your estate or believe you may have a claim, consulting with an experienced estate lawyer can provide clarity and guidance, ensuring your rights and interests are protected.

Let us handle the legal complexities. Reach out to PBL Law Group for a consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions