Beware of placing all your Assets at Risk

Key Takeaways

  • Signing a statutory declaration carries legal liability: The Federal Court case 470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd v Robinson [2017] FCA 597 demonstrates that employees signing such declarations can be held personally liable for unpaid subcontractor claims.
  • Reasonable enquiries are mandatory: Declarants must undertake reasonable enquiries about subcontractor payments and document these efforts to avoid liability under section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
  • Misleading conduct risks severe penalties: Failing to verify subcontractor payments can lead to claims of misleading or deceptive conduct, with potential financial consequences, as seen in the $1.4 million liability ruling.
  • Courts are increasingly strict: Unlike past reluctance, courts now rigorously enforce statutory declaration requirements, making it critical to seek legal advice before signing.
1 min read
Jump to...
Beware of placing all your Assets at Risk as an Employee signing a Statutory Declaration – Contractors and Subcontractors
A recent Federal Court case, 470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd v Robinson [2017] FCA 597 (30 May 2017). found a person giving a statutory declaration, to be liable for the amount outstanding under a construction contract.
Generally for contractors or subcontractors to obtain payment under a construction contract a Statutory Declaration is required to accompany a progress claim or mile stone claim. The declaration usually states that all reasonable enquires have been made in relation to payments to subcontractors engaged for work under your contract. 
The Federal Court found a declarant, who was an employee of the construction company that went into liquidation, to be liable for payment of $1.4 million, an outstanding claim by a subcontractor that was not paid. In this case the Chief operations officer of the construction company in LIQ, signed the declaration. The Federal Court viewed on the evidence presented, that he not undertake reasonable enquiries in relation to subcontractor payments.
Section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law was pleaded in that the declarants conduct amounted to misleading or deceptive conduct or was likely to mislead or deceive.
Previously the courts seemed reluctant to make adverse findings against declarants such as NSW Supreme Court decision in J Hutchinson Pty Ltd v Glavcom Pty Ltd2  however 470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd v Robinson demonstrates that declarants should no longer take statutory declarations lightly.
A person signing these statutory declarations should undertake reasonable enquiries as declared and further keep notes on the specific enquires.

Loading

Loading

Last Updated on July 20, 2025
Jump to...

Rated 5-Star By Our Clients

Latest Insights & Practical Guides

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

We will call you within 24 hours.

How Can Our Expert Lawyers Help?

Strata Law

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Book a 15-Min Consultation​

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

Google 5-star review: Excellent