Introduction

The rise of digital technology has led to an increasing trend of individuals creating informal wills using digital notes, as seen in the high-profile case of Colin Peek’s iPhone note. This case highlights the complexities and challenges surrounding the legal recognition of digital informal wills in estate planning.

This guide provides an in-depth exploration of the legal implications of digital informal wills, focusing on the Peter Dawson and Colin Peek case. It examines the legal criteria for validating such documents, the risks associated with relying on digital notes, and the importance of understanding the nuances of digital estate planning. By delving into key legal principles and real-world examples, this guide aims to clarify the role of digital informal wills in modern succession law and their impact on estate distribution.

Is an iPhone Note a Valid Will?

Colin Peek’s iPhone Note

The case of Colin Peek’s iPhone (Peek v Wheatley [2025] NSWSC 554) note will involves a dispute over a multi-million dollar estate. Colin Peek, a property developer, created a digital note on his iPhone titled “Last Will of Colin L Peek” just days before his death. This note outlined how his estate should be distributed.

The primary beneficiaries were:

• Brad Wheatley, a close friend
• Peter Dawson, a lawyer who had served Colin for many years

However, Colin’s brother, Ronald Peek, challenged the validity of the iPhone note, arguing that it was not intended to be Colin’s final will.

Key points of the case include:

• The iPhone note: The note was discovered three days after Colin’s death by Brad Wheatley and Peter Dawson. It specified that Brad would receive the majority of the estate, while Peter would receive a smaller portion for handling the will.
• Legal challenge: Ronald Peek argued that the note was merely a draft and not a final will, leading to a legal battle over the estate’s distribution.
• Court decision: The court ultimately ruled in favour of Ronald, deciding that the iPhone note did not meet the necessary legal standards to be considered a valid will.

Dispute Over Testamentary Intention

The central issue in this case was whether the iPhone note was intended by Colin Peek to serve as his final will. The court examined several factors to determine this:

Factor Examined	Description
Testamentary intention	The court assessed if Colin Peek intended the note to have immediate legal effect, noting the lack of prior discussion with beneficiaries suggested it was not finalised.
Conflict of interest	Peter Dawson’s dual role as a beneficiary and legal representative compromised the impartiality and reliability of the evidence presented.
Deletion of evidence	The deletion of text messages and emails from the iPhone post-death raised questions about whether all relevant communications had been fully disclosed.
Lack of finality	The court concluded the note lacked the necessary formality and clear intent to be considered a valid last will and testament.

This case highlights the complexities surrounding informal digital wills and the importance of adhering to legal formalities when expressing testamentary intentions.

Understanding the Legal Battle: Challenging Validity

The legal action taken by Colin’s brother, Ronald Peek, is a clear example of one of two main types of will disputes: challenging a will’s validity. This is fundamentally different from contesting a will’s fairness. Understanding this distinction is key to grasping the legal issues in this case.

Basis of the Claim	Challenging a Will’s Validity (The Issue in the Peek Case)	Contesting a Will’s Provisions (Family Provision Claim)
The Core Argument	“This document is not a legally valid will.”	“The will is valid, but its distribution is unfair because it doesn’t provide for my needs.”
The Goal	To have the document declared invalid and thrown out entirely.	To have a court increase your share from a valid will’s distribution.
The Legal Question	Did the deceased have the required mental capacity? Was there undue influence? Is it a forgery? Does it show testamentary intent?	Is the person making the claim an “eligible person”? Did the deceased fail to make adequate provision for them?

As you can see, the dispute over Colin Peek’s iPhone note was not about whether the distribution was fair to his brother. The entire legal battle was focused on the first column: proving whether the digital note was intended to be a real, final will in the first place.

Informal Digital Wills in NSW

Formal Will Requirements vs Digital Documents

Under NSW law, a valid will must meet several formal requirements:

• Be in writing
• Be signed by the testator (or another person in their presence and at their direction)
• Have the signature acknowledged by the testator in the presence of at least two witnesses
• Be attested and signed by those witnesses

These formalities serve a crucial purpose: ensuring the will’s authenticity and confirming the testator’s intent.

Digital documents, such as iPhone notes, typically fall short of these requirements. They are generally unsigned and unattested, which can lead to significant legal challenges when their validity is challenged. For instance, in Colin Peek’s case, the court ultimately ruled against the validity of his iPhone note due to insufficient evidence of testamentary intent and the absence of formal execution.

Court Evaluation of Testamentary Intention in Digital Formats

When assessing whether a digital document reflects the deceased’s final testamentary wishes, courts consider several key factors:

• Proximity to Death: How close the document’s creation was to the testator’s death
• Testator’s Statements: Whether the testator referred to the document as their will
• Witnesses: If the testator discussed the document with potential witnesses or legal advisors

In Colin Peek’s case, the court found the iPhone note lacked the necessary finality. The testator had not discussed it as his final will, and there was no evidence of intent for immediate legal effect. This highlights the importance of clear intent and proper execution in digital wills.

While courts can accept informal digital documents as wills under Section 8 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), such cases are rare and require strong evidence of intent. Therefore, seeking legal advice is crucial for ensuring digital wills meet the necessary criteria.

Validation Criteria for Digital Informal Wills

Establishing Clear Testamentary Intention

For a digital document to be recognised as a valid informal will under NSW law, it must clearly express the deceased’s final wishes. The court evaluates whether the document was intended to have immediate legal effect, meaning it was meant to operate as the person’s last will without needing further action.

Key factors considered include:

• Reference to the document as a will: If the deceased referred to the document as their “last will” or indicated it should take effect upon their death.
• Completion and finality: Evidence that the document was completed and not merely a draft or preparatory note.
• Proximity to death: If the document was created close to the deceased’s death, it may indicate a final testamentary intention.

The absence of clear intent, such as indications that the document was a working draft or incomplete, can lead the court to reject it as a valid will.

Evidence Requirements and Challenges with Digital Documents

Digital documents present unique challenges in establishing their validity as informal wills.

Key considerations include:

Challenge / Consideration	Explanation
Data integrity	Courts may question if a digital document was altered or if content was deleted after the person’s death, as occurred in the case.
Lack of witnesses	Digital documents typically do not have signatures and witness attestations, which are standard for traditional wills and serve to undermine their reliability.
Conflict of interest	The credibility of evidence can be questioned if a beneficiary or their legal representative has a personal interest in the document’s validation.

The court carefully examines these factors to determine whether the digital document meets the necessary criteria for recognition as a valid will.

Comparing Digital Informal Wills with Traditional Wills

Risks & Uncertainties of Relying on Digital Notes

Digital informal wills, such as those created on iPhones, present several significant risks and uncertainties that can affect their legal validity. These challenges include:

Risk / Uncertainty	Description
Lack of formal requirements	Digital notes typically do not meet essential legal formalities like signatures and witness attestations, inviting legal challenges.
Difficulty proving intent	As seen in the Colin Peek case, it can be difficult to provide sufficient evidence of testamentary intent for an informal digital note.
Formality and finality issues	Digital documents often lack the required legal formality and sense of finality, making it hard to prove the deceased’s true intentions.
Data integrity concerns	The potential for deleted communications or altered digital content can undermine the reliability of the evidence presented in court.

These factors collectively highlight the potential for disputes and the significant challenges in validating digital notes as legitimate wills in legal proceedings.

Advantages of Formal Witnessed Wills for Estate Certainty

Traditional wills offer several compelling advantages that ensure greater estate certainty and peace of mind. These benefits include:

Advantage of Formal Wills	Description
Clear execution formalities	Traditional wills are signed and witnessed, providing unambiguous evidence of the testator’s intent.
Reduced risk of disputes	Following established legal protocols minimises the likelihood of family conflicts and contested estates.
Legal security	Formal wills help avoid conflicts of interest and typically reduce the need for court intervention to validate the document.
Reliable distribution method	The formal nature of traditional wills ensures the deceased’s wishes are executed without ambiguity or legal challenges.

By adhering to legal formalities, traditional wills provide both peace of mind and robust protection for the interests of all parties involved in the estate distribution process.

Conclusion

The rise of digital technology has introduced new complexities in estate planning, as seen in the case of Colin Peek’s iPhone note. This case underscores the legal challenges surrounding digital informal wills, highlighting the importance of clear testamentary intent and adherence to formal requirements. While digital documents can offer convenience, they often lack the necessary execution and witness attestations, leading to disputes and legal uncertainties.

If you have questions about digital informal wills or need assistance with estate planning, contact the experts at PBL Law Group. Our specialised services in wills and estate planning across NSW can provide you with the guidance and support needed to ensure your wishes are carried out with clarity and legal security. Reach out today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards securing your estate’s future.

Frequently Asked Questions