Introduction
Contesting a will based on financial need is a significant legal action in New South Wales, particularly for those who believe they have not been adequately provided for in a deceased estate. This guide explores the legal framework surrounding family provision claims, focusing on the critical role of financial need in determining the outcome of such cases.
For individuals navigating the complexities of contesting a will, understanding how financial need is assessed and demonstrated is essential. This guide provides practical insights and real-world examples to help you grasp the legal process, documentation requirements, and court considerations involved in family provision claims.
Understanding Financial Need in Family Provision Claims
Defining Financial Need
Financial need is a critical factor in family provision claims under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). It refers to a claimant’s inability to meet their basic living expenses and financial obligations due to inadequate provision in the will.
The Supreme Court of NSW requires detailed evidence of financial circumstances to establish genuine need. This includes comprehensive disclosure of:
- Assets
- Liabilities
- Income
- Expenses
This information demonstrates why additional provision from the estate is necessary for the claimant.
When evaluating financial need, the court considers several key aspects:
| Assessment Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Objective Assessment | The court evaluates whether the claimant can meet daily needs based on their financial resources. |
| Relative Assessment | The court compares the claimant’s financial situation with other beneficiaries to ensure fairness. |
| Moral Obligation | While the deceased may have had a moral duty to provide, the court focuses primarily on the claimant’s demonstrated financial need. |
Criteria for Assessing Financial Need
The court uses specific criteria to evaluate a claimant’s financial circumstances:
| Criterion | Evaluation Focus |
|---|---|
| Income and Expenses | Detailed records of income sources and regular expenses are essential to assess the claimant’s ability to cover living costs. |
| Assets and Liabilities | Disclosure of all assets (e.g., property, investments) and liabilities (e.g., debts) is required to understand the claimant’s financial standing. |
| Financial Dependency | The court considers whether the claimant was dependent on the deceased for financial support, especially in cases involving spouses or children. |
| Earning Capacity | The claimant’s ability to earn income, including any limitations due to health or employment status, is evaluated. |
| Size and Nature of the Estate | The court assesses the estate’s value and how it is distributed among beneficiaries to ensure fair provision. |
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Contesting a Will Based on Financial Need
Indicators for Contesting a Will
A will can be contested on the basis of insufficient financial provision when there is clear evidence that the claimant’s needs are not adequately met.
Key indicators that may warrant contesting a will include:
| Indicator | Description |
|---|---|
| Insufficient income or assets | The claimant lacks the financial resources to meet their daily living expenses or support their dependents. |
| High liabilities or expenses | The claimant has significant debts or ongoing expenses that cannot be covered by the current provision. |
| Dependence on others | The claimant is financially dependent on another person, such as a spouse or family member, and this dependency creates a financial burden. |
| Lack of proper maintenance and support | The provision in the will does not align with the claimant’s needs for proper maintenance and support, as required under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). |
The court will assess whether the claimant’s financial circumstances demonstrate a genuine need for further provision from the estate.
Legal Considerations & Court Discretion
The legal process for contesting a will in NSW involves filing a family provision claim under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The court has discretion to award further provision from the estate if it determines that the claimant’s financial need justifies it.
Key legal considerations include:
| Legal Consideration | Court’s Approach |
|---|---|
| Size and nature of the estate | The court will evaluate the overall value and distribution of the deceased’s assets to determine if there is capacity for further provision. |
| Competing claims | The court must balance the needs of all beneficiaries and claimants, considering their financial circumstances and relationship to the deceased. |
| Moral obligation | While focusing on financial need, the court may also consider the deceased’s moral obligation to provide for certain individuals, such as dependent children or spouses. |
The court’s decision is guided by the principles of fairness and equity, ensuring that the claimant’s needs are met without unfairly disadvantaging other beneficiaries.
Case Study Stone v Stone and Its Lessons
The case of Gail Patricia Stone v Michael John Stone [2019] NSWSC 233 (‘Stone v Stone‘) highlights the importance of providing robust evidence of financial need when contesting a will. In this matter, the deceased mother left her estate to her son and made no provision for her estranged daughter. The daughter claimed she had insufficient financial resources, but her claim lacked detailed evidence of her income, expenses, and liabilities. Additionally, she failed to provide information about her de facto partner’s financial circumstances, despite being financially dependent on him.
The court directed the daughter to provide additional evidence before the hearing, but she did not comply. As a result, the court dismissed her claim, emphasising that the onus of proof lies with the claimant to demonstrate financial need.
This case underscores the critical importance of:
- Providing comprehensive financial disclosure, including bank statements, tax returns, and expense records.
- Meeting court deadlines for submitting evidence.
- Ensuring compliance with procedural requirements to avoid dismissal of the claim.
Stone v Stone serves as a cautionary tale, reminding claimants that insufficient or incomplete evidence can lead to an unsuccessful outcome.
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Documenting & Demonstrating Financial Need
Essential Financial Records & Evidence
To successfully demonstrate financial need in a family provision claim, it is crucial to provide comprehensive and detailed financial records. These documents serve as the foundation for assessing whether the claimant lacks adequate provision for their proper maintenance and support.
Key financial records include:
| Financial Record | Purpose in a Family Provision Claim |
|---|---|
| Bank statements | Should cover a significant period to illustrate the claimant’s financial situation and transactions. |
| Pay stubs and income records | Essential for verifying the claimant’s current income sources and employment status. |
| Tax returns | Recent tax filings can provide insight into the claimant’s financial health and obligations. |
| Expense records | Detailed documentation of regular expenses, such as rent, utilities, and medical bills, helps establish the claimant’s financial obligations. |
Additionally, if the claimant has dependents, such as children or a spouse, financial records for these individuals may also be necessary to fully assess the household’s financial circumstances.
Importance of Full Disclosure & Expert Guidance from a Solicitor
Full and honest disclosure of all financial information is critical in family provision claims. The court requires a complete picture of the claimant’s financial situation to make an informed decision.
Failure to provide comprehensive evidence can lead to the dismissal of the claim, as seen in the case of Stone v Stone. In this instance, the claimant’s insufficient and unsupported financial disclosures resulted in the court being unable to assess their financial need adequately, ultimately leading to the claim’s dismissal.
Engaging a solicitor experienced in family provision matters is highly recommended for several reasons:
- They can guide the claimant in gathering the necessary documentation
- They ensure compliance with all procedural requirements
- They provide valuable advice on navigating the legal process
- They improve the likelihood of a successful claim
A solicitor’s expertise is particularly beneficial in complex cases or when dealing with stringent court deadlines, as highlighted in the Chester v Cowin [2024] NSWSC 1554, where incomplete financial disclosure significantly impacted the claim’s outcome.
By ensuring thorough documentation and seeking professional legal advice, claimants can present a robust case, demonstrating their financial need effectively and increasing their chances of a favourable outcome.
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
Conclusion
Contesting a will based on financial need is a complex legal process that requires a thorough understanding of family provision claims under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).
If you are considering contesting a will, seeking expert legal advice is crucial. Contact PBL Law Group’s team of experienced family provision claim lawyers in NSW, who can provide specialised guidance tailored to your specific circumstances, helping you navigate the legal complexities involved in these matters.
Frequently Asked Questions
