Introduction
The death of a loved one is a challenging time, and discovering that you have been unfairly treated in their will can add significant emotional and financial stress. If you believe a will is unfair, there are legal avenues to pursue in New South Wales (NSW) to address the issue, which are governed by the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).
This guide outlines the two distinct legal pathways available when dealing with an unfair will. It provides essential information on how to either challenge the will’s fundamental validity or contest its provisions by making a Family Provision Claim to seek adequate provision from the deceased person’s estate.
Understanding What Makes A Will Unfair In NSW
When a will is described as “unfair” in New South Wales, it can refer to two distinct legal issues. Grasping this difference is crucial because it determines the legal path you might take to address the situation.
Generally, an “unfair” will falls into one of two categories:
- Invalid document: this occurs when the will itself is legally defective—for example, if it was created under fraudulent circumstances or is a forgery.
- Inadequate provision: more common than invalidity, this arises when a legally valid will fails to make adequate provision for the proper maintenance, education or advancement in life of an eligible person, such as a spouse or child.
These different meanings of an “unfair” will lead to two separate legal avenues for seeking a remedy.
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Your Two Legal Pathways For An Unfair Will
Challenging The Will’s Fundamental Validity
One legal option is to challenge the will’s fundamental validity. This pathway involves arguing that the document is legally flawed and should be disregarded entirely by the court. In other words, it’s not about whether the distribution is fair but whether the will qualifies as a legitimate legal document in the first place.
Common grounds for such a challenge include:
- Undue influence, where the testator was pressured or coerced.
- Forgery of the will document.
- Fraudulent creation of the will.
- Lack of mental capacity, meaning the testator did not understand what they were signing.
- Improper execution, if the will was not signed and witnessed correctly under New South Wales law.
Contesting The Will’s Provisions For Fairer Distribution
The second pathway is to contest the will’s provisions by making a Family Provision Claim. This approach accepts that the will is valid but argues that its distribution is unfair because it fails to provide adequately for an eligible person’s proper maintenance, education, and advancement in life.
Under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), certain individuals—such as a spouse, child, or other dependent—can apply to the Supreme Court of NSW to:
- Obtain a share of the deceased estate.
- Secure a larger share than what the will originally provides.
Ultimately, a Family Provision Claim asks the court to adjust the terms of the will to ensure a fair distribution to those the deceased had a responsibility to support.
Challenging vs. Contesting: Understanding Your Two Legal Pathways
The first and most critical step in dealing with an “unfair” will is to understand which legal path applies to your situation. The terms challenging and contesting refer to two entirely different legal actions with different goals, grounds, and time limits. Choosing the correct pathway is essential for your success.
| Basis of the Claim | Challenging a Will’s Validity | Contesting a Will’s Provisions (Family Provision Claim) |
| The Core Argument | “This will is legally invalid and should be thrown out.” | “This will is legally valid, but its distribution is unfair to me.” |
| The Goal | To have the will declared void, causing an earlier will or the rules of intestacy to take effect. | To have a court adjust the will’s terms to provide you with a larger share from the estate. |
| Common Grounds | Lack of mental capacity, undue influence, fraud, forgery, or improper signing and witnessing. | Being an “eligible person” (like a spouse, child, or dependent) who has not received adequate provision for your proper maintenance and needs. |
| Time Limit | No strict statutory limit, but you must act urgently before the estate is distributed. | A strict 12-month deadline from the date of the deceased’s death. |
The following sections will explore each of these two pathways in detail, helping you determine which one aligns with your circumstances.
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
Pathway 1 Challenging The Legal Validity Of The Will
Common Grounds For A Validity Challenge
In New South Wales, a will can be challenged if there are legitimate reasons to believe the document does not represent the true testamentary intentions of the deceased. An experienced legal professional can assist in gathering crucial evidence—such as medical records or witness statements—to support such a claim.
Common reasons for challenging a will’s validity include:
| Ground for Challenge | Description |
|---|---|
| Lack of Testamentary Capacity | The testator did not possess the required mental capacity to understand the document, their assets, or the claims of potential beneficiaries, often due to conditions like dementia. |
| Undue Influence | The testator was pressured, coerced, or subjected to excessive influence, leading to a will that did not reflect their own wishes. |
| Fraud or Forgery | The will is not authentic because it was forged, or the testator was deceived into signing a document they did not realise was a will. |
| Improper Execution | The will fails to meet the strict legal formalities required by Part 2.1 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), such as correct signing and witnessing. |
Who Can Challenge A Will’s Validity
Only individuals with a “legitimate interest” in the deceased’s estate may challenge a will in NSW. In other words, their own position must be affected by the outcome of the challenge.
Those who may have standing include:
| Category of Person | Reason for Having “Legitimate Interest” |
|---|---|
| Excluded Beneficiaries | Relatives who were named as beneficiaries in an earlier will but were excluded from a later one. |
| Concerned Parties | Anyone who suspects the will was created under suspicious circumstances, such as through fraud or undue influence. |
| Family Members | Individuals who believe the deceased made the will after a dementia diagnosis or during a serious illness that affected their capacity. |
| Intestate Heirs | A person entitled to a share of the estate under the rules of intestacy (if no valid will existed) but was left out of the current will. |
The Process For Challenging A Will’s Validity
Why You Must Act Quickly To Challenge A Will
While there is no strict statutory time limit in New South Wales for challenging the validity of a will, it is crucial to act without delay. If you wait too long, the executor may obtain a grant of probate and begin distributing the assets of the deceased estate to the beneficiaries.
Once the assets have been distributed, recovering them can be extremely difficult or even impossible. Therefore, any delay risks making your challenge futile, regardless of how strong your legal grounds are.
Seeking prompt legal advice is essential to protect your position and ensure the estate is not dealt with before your concerns are addressed.
Key Steps Lodging A Caveat & Court Proceedings
The process for challenging a will’s validity typically begins with seeking legal advice from a solicitor specialising in wills and estate law. If there appear to be legitimate grounds for a challenge, the next step is often to lodge a caveat with the Supreme Court of NSW.
A caveat is a legal notice that temporarily prevents a grant of probate from being issued for the will in question. This provides time for the dispute to be investigated and potentially resolved.
The key steps in the process generally include:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Lodging a Caveat | A lawyer files a caveat with the Supreme Court of NSW, which remains in force for six months, formally signalling the challenge and temporarily preventing probate. |
| Negotiation and Mediation | Many disputes are resolved through negotiation or a formal mediation process, which is a less costly alternative to a court hearing. |
| Commencing Court Proceedings | If unresolved, a statement of claim is filed, and the matter proceeds to be heard and decided by a judge in the Supreme Court of NSW. |
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
Pathway 2: Contesting The Will’s Provisions With A Family Provision Claim
Who Is Eligible To Make A Family Provision Claim
In New South Wales, you can contest a will by making a Family Provision Claim if you are an ‘eligible person’ under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). This legal action does not challenge the will’s validity but argues that it fails to make adequate provision for your proper maintenance, education, or advancement in life.
To make a family provision claim, you must fall into one of the specific categories defined by the legislation. These eligible persons include:
| Eligible Person | Description |
|---|---|
| A spouse or de facto partner | The husband, wife, or de facto partner (including a same-sex partner) of the deceased at the time of their death. |
| A child of the deceased | This category includes both biological and adopted children. |
| A former spouse | An ex-husband or ex-wife of the deceased person. |
| A person dependent on the deceased | Individuals who were wholly or partly dependent on the deceased and are either a grandchild or were a member of the deceased’s household. |
| A person in a close personal relationship | Someone who was living in a close personal relationship with the deceased at the time of their death. |
It is important to note that while a spouse, de facto partner, or child can make an application as of right, other eligible persons must demonstrate to the court that there are “factors warranting” their application. This means they need to show that the deceased had a moral obligation to provide for them.
Key Factors The Court Considers In Your Claim
When the Supreme Court of NSW assesses a Family Provision Claim, it does not simply change a will because it seems unfair. Instead, the court carefully considers a range of factors to determine whether adequate provision has been made for the applicant.
The court will evaluate the following key matters when deciding whether to make a family provision order:
| Factor | What the Court Evaluates |
|---|---|
| The applicant’s financial situation | The applicant’s current financial resources and their future financial needs, as well as the circumstances of any person they live with. |
| The relationship with the deceased | The nature and length of the relationship between the applicant and the deceased person. |
| The size and nature of the estate | The total value of the deceased estate’s assets that are available for distribution. |
| The needs of other beneficiaries | The court balances the applicant’s needs against the financial needs and claims of other beneficiaries named in the will. |
| Contributions made by the applicant | Any financial and non-financial contributions the applicant made to the deceased’s property or welfare. |
| The deceased’s intentions | Any evidence of the testator’s testamentary intentions, although this is not the deciding factor. |
| The applicant’s age and health | The applicant’s age and any physical, intellectual, or mental disabilities relevant to assessing their needs. |
The Process For Making A Family Provision Claim
The Strict 12-Month Time Limit You Must Meet
In New South Wales, you must make a Family Provision Claim within a strict time limit. An application must be filed with the court within 12 months of the deceased person’s date of death, as stipulated by the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).
This deadline is critical, and failing to act promptly can result in you being barred from making a claim altogether. While the court may grant an extension in exceptional circumstances, it is essential to seek legal advice as soon as possible to protect your rights and ensure you do not miss this important window.
Resolving Your Dispute Through Mediation & Court
Most family provision disputes in NSW are resolved without proceeding to a final court hearing. The legal process encourages resolution through negotiation or mediation, which is a less formal and more cost-effective way to reach a settlement.
The typical steps involved in resolving a claim include:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Seeking Legal Advice | The first step is to consult a lawyer to assess your eligibility and the strength of your claim. |
| Negotiation and Mediation | The lawyer will likely attempt to negotiate a settlement with the executor, often proceeding to mediation to reach a mutually agreeable outcome. |
| Commencing Court Proceedings | If no agreement is reached, a summons is filed in the Supreme Court of NSW, which will then hear the evidence and make a decision. |
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
Conclusion
Dealing with an unfair will in New South Wales requires understanding two distinct legal pathways: challenging the will’s fundamental validity or contesting its provisions through a Family Provision Claim. This guide has detailed the specific grounds and processes for each option, empowering you to identify the appropriate course of action based on whether the will is legally flawed or simply fails to make adequate provision for you.
If you have been unfairly treated in a will, it is vital to act promptly to protect your rights, as strict time limits apply for challenging a will’s validity or filing a Family Provision Claim. For trusted expertise and clear guidance on your legal options, contact our specialised Wills & Estates team at PBL Law Group today to help you navigate the complexities and secure a fair outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
Challenging a will involves arguing that the will document itself is legally invalid due to issues like fraud or the testator’s lack of mental capacity. Contesting a will through a Family Provision Claim accepts the will is valid but argues its provisions are unfair because they fail to make adequate financial provision for an eligible person.
There is no strict statutory time limit in New South Wales to challenge a will’s validity. However, you must act quickly, as any delay risks the executor distributing the estate assets, which could make your challenge impossible to enforce.
You must file a Family Provision Claim with the court within 12 months of the deceased person’s date of death. This is a strict deadline under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), so it is crucial to get legal advice promptly to avoid being barred from making a claim.
If you suspect a will was created due to fraud, forgery, or undue pressure, you should seek immediate legal advice as you may have grounds to challenge its validity. Your lawyer may advise lodging a caveat with the Supreme Court of NSW to prevent a grant of probate while the matter is investigated.
Yes, an estranged child is still eligible to make a Family Provision Claim in New South Wales. The court often gives more weight to the child’s financial needs than to the closeness of the relationship with the deceased parent.
To challenge a will’s validity, you must have a legitimate interest in the estate, such as being a beneficiary in a previous will. To contest a will with a Family Provision Claim, you must be an ‘eligible person’ as defined in the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), which includes spouses, children, and certain dependents.
The cost to dispute a will varies depending on its complexity and whether it is resolved early through mediation, which may cost between $5,000 and $10,000. In many successful Family Provision Claims, the court may order that the legal costs be paid from the deceased estate.
No, most will disputes in NSW are resolved through negotiation or mediation before reaching a final court hearing. Mediation provides a less formal and more cost-effective way to reach a settlement.
It is more difficult to make a claim after an estate has been distributed, but it may still be possible. For a Family Provision Claim, the court has the power to make orders over certain ‘notional estate’ assets, but for a validity challenge, recovering assets after distribution is extremely difficult.
![]()