Introduction
In New South Wales, the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) provides eligible individuals the right to contest a deceased person’s will, including those in a close personal relationship with the deceased. This legal category, distinct from marital or de facto relationships, allows individuals who were not spouses or partners to seek provision from the estate if they meet specific criteria.
This guide delves into the legal requirements for establishing a close personal relationship under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), with particular insights from the landmark case of Khadarou v Antarakis [2021] NSWSC 743 (‘Khadarou v Antarakis (2021)‘) It explores how courts interpret such relationships and offers practical advice for those considering a will contest. Whether you’re navigating the complexities of estate disputes or seeking clarity on your eligibility, this comprehensive guide provides essential information to help you understand your rights and options.
Defining Close Personal Relationship in Estate Disputes
Defining a “Close Personal Relationship”
The Succession Act 2006 (NSW) defines a close personal relationship as one between two adults, whether related by family or not, who live together and provide each other with domestic support and personal care. This relationship must exist at the time of the deceased’s death to be eligible for a family provision claim.
Key elements of this definition include:
| Key Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Living Together | Does not strictly require full-time shared residence but can involve regular cohabitation or shared household responsibilities. The court in Khadarou v Antarakis (2021) noted the lack of shared residence was a critical factor. |
| Domestic Support & Personal Care | Involves providing support like cooking, cleaning, shopping, and personal care. This support must be mutual or provided without payment or as part of a charitable act. |
| Legal Category | This relationship is distinct from marital or de facto relationships and is defined by a deep emotional and domestic connection, allowing for a will contest if criteria are met. |
Close Personal vs. De Facto Relationships
A close personal relationship differs from a de facto relationship in several key ways:
| Distinguishing Factor | Explanation in a Close Personal Relationship |
|---|---|
| Absence of Romantic Partnership | A romantic or sexual component is not required; the bond is often a deep friendship or familial-like. |
| Legal Criteria | The focus is on the provision of domestic support and personal care, rather than the nature of the emotional bond. |
| Living Arrangements | May exist even if parties do not reside together full-time, provided there is evidence of shared household duties and mutual support. |
Understanding these distinctions is essential for determining eligibility to contest a will based on a close personal relationship. The court’s interpretation, as seen in Khadarou v Antarakis (2021), highlights the importance of cohabitation and the quality of support provided in establishing such a relationship.
Speak to a Lawyer Today.
We respond within 24 hours.
Key Requirements for a Close Personal Relationship
Proving You Lived Together
Living together is a critical requirement for establishing a close personal relationship under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). This involves more than occasional visits or providing support; it requires shared residence and joint household management.
The court assesses several key factors when determining if parties truly lived together:
- Whether both parties regarded the same address as their home
- Shared maintenance of the house and household responsibilities
- Joint decision-making about the household
- Whether both parties slept under the same roof, even if not continuously
In the landmark case of Khadarou v Antarakis (2021), the court ruled that frequent visits and support did not equate to living together, as the claimant maintained a separate residence. This precedent highlights the importance of genuine cohabitation when contesting a will based on a close personal relationship.
Proving Domestic Support & Personal Care
Domestic support and personal care are essential elements to qualify for a close personal relationship. These components must be consistent and integral to the relationship, not merely occasional or provided for material gain.
The court looks for evidence of:
- Regular household assistance such as cooking, cleaning, and shopping
- Personal care, including helping with medication or mobility needs
- Emotional support and companionship
The support must form a primary aspect of the relationship rather than being incidental or commercially motivated. When evaluating claims based on close personal relationships, courts carefully examine the nature, extent, and motivation behind the care provided.
Case Study: Khadarou v Antarakis (2021)
Case Background & Key Issues
The case of Khadarou v Antarakis (2021) offered valuable insights into how courts interpret close personal relationships under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). In this significant legal matter, Mr. Khadarou claimed eligibility to contest the will of Mr. Antarakis based on their close personal relationship.
Their relationship was characterised by:
- A long-standing friendship
- Regular support provided by Mr. Khadarou, including domestic help and shopping
- Emotional care, particularly as Mr. Antarakis’s health declined
Despite the evident close bond between the two men, the court ultimately ruled that Mr. Khadarou did not satisfy the legal criteria for a close personal relationship. This decision hinged primarily on the absence of cohabitation, a critical requirement under the Act.
The Court’s Ruling on Cohabitation & Eligibility
The court’s decision centred on the requirement that parties must “live together” to qualify as being in a close personal relationship. To determine whether Mr. Khadarou and Mr. Antarakis were living together, the court examined several key factors:
| Factor Examined | Court’s Finding in Khadarou v Antarakis (2021) |
|---|---|
| Shared Residence | Mr. Khadarou maintained his own separate home with his family and slept there every night, while Mr. Antarakis lived alone. They did not share a common residential address. |
| Sleeping Arrangements | The court noted critically that Mr. Khadarou never slept at Mr. Antarakis’s residence, which was a key factor in disproving cohabitation. |
| Household Responsibilities | While Mr. Khadarou provided assistance with tasks like cleaning and shopping, the court ruled this support did not meet the definition of “living together” under the Succession Act. |
The court concluded that Mr. Khadarou and Mr. Antarakis were not living together, as they did not share the same residence or regard the same place as their home. This ruling emphasises the importance of cohabitation in establishing eligibility for a close personal relationship claim under the Act. Furthermore, the case highlights the challenges of meeting the legal criteria for such claims and demonstrates the strict interpretation of “living together” applied by the courts.
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
Factors Impacting a Will Contest
Quality & Duration of the Relationship
When evaluating a close personal relationship claim to contest a will, the court examines evidence of the quality and duration of the relationship to assess its significance. This thorough examination helps determine whether the claim is valid and if the provision made in the will is adequate.
Key considerations in this assessment include:
| Key Consideration | Focus of Assessment |
|---|---|
| Nature of the Relationship | The depth of the emotional connection and the level of mutual support between the parties. |
| Duration | Longer relationships may suggest a significant bond, but the court also weighs the consistency and quality of interactions. |
| Shared Activities | Evidence of shared household responsibilities, joint decision-making, and mutual care. |
| Prior Testamentary Statements | Any previous wills or statements from the deceased that acknowledge the relationship or make provision for the claimant. |
The court evaluates whether the relationship demonstrates a level of commitment and interdependence that justifies a claim under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). This evaluation forms a crucial part of the overall assessment process.
Financial Resources & Contributions
In addition to relationship factors, the court also assesses the financial circumstances of the claimant and the contributions made to the deceased’s welfare.
This financial assessment focuses on:
| Financial Aspect | Focus of Assessment |
|---|---|
| Financial Needs | The claimant’s current financial situation and whether they require support from the estate. |
| Contributions to the Deceased | The extent of financial, domestic, or emotional support the claimant provided to the deceased. |
| Dependency | Whether the claimant was financially dependent on the deceased at the time of their death. |
| Estate Value | The total value of the estate and its current distribution plan among the named beneficiaries. |
Through this comprehensive evaluation, the court aims to ensure that the distribution of the estate is fair and reasonable, considering all relevant circumstances. If the claimant can demonstrate significant contributions and financial need, the court may find in their favour.
Get legal advice you can rely on.
Contact us today.
Conclusion
Understanding the legal requirements for contesting a will based on a close personal relationship in New South Wales is crucial for those seeking fair provision from a deceased estate. The Succession Act 2006 (NSW) sets clear criteria, emphasising the need for cohabitation and the provision of domestic support and personal care. The landmark case of Khadarou v Antarakis (2021) highlights the importance of these elements, particularly the necessity of living together, which is critical for establishing eligibility.
If you believe you have been inadequately provided for in a will and meet the criteria for a close personal relationship, it is essential to seek legal advice from specialist lawyers. Contact PBL Law Group’s experienced will contest lawyers today for expert guidance tailored to your situation. Their specialised services can help you navigate the complexities of family provision claims and ensure your rights are protected.
Frequently Asked Questions
